• Breaking News

    Monday, November 25, 2019

    Fire Emblem The House Lords

    Fire Emblem The House Lords


    The House Lords

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 10:26 AM PST

    Normal Schoolgirl Ingrid

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 01:32 PM PST

    How to tell apart all 596 Fire Emblem characters | Unraveled

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 12:18 PM PST

    Oh Dimitri

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 05:12 PM PST

    When the students REALLY need to pass those Certifications

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 05:30 PM PST

    Lady Seiros sketch

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 04:48 AM PST

    blessed ferdinand bean

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 02:53 PM PST

    Fire Emblem: Three Houses Edelgard Cosplay by Our Partner @luxlocosplay

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 06:34 PM PST

    My birthday is essentially Three Houses hell. Behold the mail man's gift!

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 10:50 AM PST

    (Edelgard/Byleth) - a vow and a Sword.

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 05:16 PM PST

    [COMMISSION] [OC] Someone commissioned me to draw their persona with Hilda!

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 06:57 AM PST

    There’s a really bothersome mistranslation in CF’s final cutscene

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 05:19 PM PST

    Okay, I must confess that this is my first time doing something like this and I'm a little nervous, plus, I don't know if I'm doing it right but anyway, here I go.

    This was pointed out by a friend of mine yesterday and it have been confirmed by /u/jinandlora.

    In CF's final, and only, cutscene. Edelgard says "When humanity stand strong and people reach out for each other, there's no need for gods. Rhea, your reign of tyranny is over"

    However that last phrase is a mistranslation.

    In JP she says this:

    あなた、の役目はおわったわ (Anata, no yakume owatta wa)

    Which is actually translated to "Your role/duty is over/done"

    I really don't want to accuse Treehouse of having something against Edelgard but A LOT of mistranslations are related to her and...well, that makes me think.

    submitted by /u/Asayuki_Kuroe
    [link] [comments]

    Smiling Dimitri makes me happy

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 09:08 AM PST

    Hubert and Edelgard relationship analysis. [Spoilers and I'm being serious for once.]

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 03:07 PM PST

    Usually when I post stuff like this, I'm shitposting. However, Hubert and Edelgard's relationship interests me to now end because it seems multifaceted. On the surface, it just looks like Hubert is a loyally devoted confidant and, based on his A support with Edelgard, is also acting out of love. He is drawn to Edelgard, as he said, purely out of personal devotion because he loves her. However, I don't entirely buy into that and we're going to see why.

    First off, Edegard and Hubert's relationship is kind of weird. As we see in Byleth's B support with Edelgard

    Edelgard: "Ugh... I'm so sick of it all. There is so much to be done, yet all I encounter are new problems and pitfalls. Ugh... Sometimes I wish I could spend just one day doing absolutely nothing and gorging myself on sweets! But... Hubert would never allow it."

    This line always struck me as odd. Hubert is, in some way/shape/form, controlling over Edelgard. She wants to just goof around yet he often pushes her to act more as an Emperor. You actually get a support point up with Hubert if you choose this line.

    Such are the burdens of an emperor.

    This isn't to say Hubert is controlling in an aggressive way but more in a passive way. He pushes Edelgard to act more emperorly. This also flies in the face of one common joke tossed around. That Hubert would do anything for Edelgard. This isn't true as he does go behind her back quite often. Noy only do we learn he hides things from Edelgard in his B and A support with Edelgard, but also in his B support with Ferdinand where he delivered a letter that Edelgard explicitly forbade him to. His argument?

    Ferdinand: "I cannot believe it! You disobeyed a direct order? I thought you were her loyal aide."

    Hubert: "Unwaveringly. All that I do, I do for her. I seem to recall you expressing a similar sentiment. It is our role to guide her when she is on the wrong course of action. Is that not what you said?"

    And this is where he get to Hubert outright admitting part of his role. He is "guiding" Edelgard down a route he sees fit for her even if she doesn't want to go down. But why? This is where I feel him saying he loves her may not be entirely so. Even if he does love her, something more is clearly at play. Another thing pushing him to act this way, if you will.

    In Hubert's C support with Hanneman, he says this.

    Hubert: "Since the dawn of the Adrestian Empire, House Vestra has served House Hresvelg as the emperor's right hand. My father spat on a legacy of loyalty and devotion that had lasted 1,000 years. He conspired with the ministers to usurp power from the emperor. And Lady Edelgard..."

    This is where I am going to make a spicy claim. Hubert is an Authoritarian. He believes in loyalty, order, and tradition. He hates his father for dashing that tradition he idealized. He wants a strongman leader and sees Edelgard as this strongman leader. He wants her to take the role of that strongman leader and is trying to push her down the route of being his ideal strongman leader.

    I don't base this off of nothing. He hints at this in his B support with Dorothea.

    Hubert: "Everyone has a path in life. Lady Edelgard has shown me mine. It is just beside her own. So we walk together, side by side. We stride ever forward, yielding to nothing and no one."

    Let's move onto Edelgard. Despite the fact she complains of Hubert always being there to drag her back to her royal duties, she does hold him in high regards.

    Edelgard: "Yes? Oh! It's you, Professor. I was certain it was Hubert coming to drag me back to my duties. Your Majesty, you must know your supreme talents are needed at present. Why not gaze at these documents instead of the sky?"

    Byleth: "That sounds like Hubert."

    Edelgard: Doesn't it? And the worst part is that he's always right, so I can't even argue with him.

    Unlike Hubert who talks about Edelgard a lot, Edelgard doesn't talk about Hubert all too much. However, her C support with him shows her pondering his life without her. She sees him enjoying his time at the monastery and perhaps feels she may not be good for him. Thinking he may have had a more peaceful life.

    Edelgard: "Sometimes I wonder if your life could have taken you down a different path. If you had never met me and entered my service, you might have had a more peaceful"

    We also know that she's not all too fond of Hubert keeping things from her. This is where a fault comes into their relationship. Edelgard wants a deeper connection with Hubert and Hubert simply wants to control her to be his idea strongman leader to keep him on the straight and narrow. It also means something else. Their relationship is toxic. They bring out the worst in one another. Hubert pushes Edelgard to be a more ideal emperor when she really doesn't want to be and Edelgard, albeit unintentionally unlike Hubert who does it deliberately, pushes Hubert to continue his authoritarian lifestyle.

    I'd like to point out this idea of Hubert and Edelgard's relationship being toxic isn't entirely my own. I took it from this one post which talked about Edelgard's trauma and how Hubert is probably not very good for her. I simply expanded on it and looking at it... yeah, they're not good for each other. It's not apparent on the surface, but yeah they aren't good for each other. Maybe it'll get better after their A support when Hubert agreed to start telling Edelgard more things, but given their paired endings that doesn't seem likely.

    submitted by /u/ColdBrewCoffeeGuy
    [link] [comments]

    When you miss in Fire Emblem

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 11:34 AM PST

    Swapped Soren and Caeda's colors!

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 09:12 AM PST

    [OC Fanart] FE3h-Pinch fight!!

    Posted: 24 Nov 2019 11:36 PM PST

    My first Annette drawing with brush pens. “I’m your girl!” ��

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 03:13 AM PST

    Favorite “injured” quote when you select a character?

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 09:18 AM PST

    What I mean by this is that when you select a character with their HP less than a certain amount (50%?), they will give a unique quote - kind of like how they say something when you select them for the first time in a map.

    I just played through CF and I really like Jeritza's "I am unafraid". The way he says it is so badass.

    submitted by /u/yoda17
    [link] [comments]

    I drew Noire for a friend

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 04:28 PM PST

    Missed Opportunity in Golden Deer Final Map

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 04:10 PM PST

    I think it would have been a bit cooler if every noble you had with you had a dialog with their respective member of the 10 Elites and not just Claude when he fights Riegan.

    submitted by /u/metalman510
    [link] [comments]

    Ignatz's Evolution Tree (Spoilers for FFXV)

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 12:11 AM PST

    Magical Elements of Three Houses Playable Characters + Rhea

    Posted: 25 Nov 2019 05:44 PM PST

    See Here

    Regarding my methodology, I assigned an element to each offensive spell. I used both spell descriptions and animations/historical categorizations to classify them. For Fire, I found Fire, Bolganone, Ragnarok, and Agnea's Arrow to be fairly obvious based on description, and threw Meteor in there since it seemed reasonable all things considered. For Thunder, I decided upon Thunder, Thoron, and Bolting. For Wind I came up with Wind, Cutting Gale, and Excalibur. I assigned Blizzard and Fimbulvetr to "Ice", which I realize is not a historically established element but seems to be unique from Wind in this iteration (I'm pretty sure the in-game description also calls it "ice magic"). For Light I decided that only White Magic spells should be included, so Seraphim, Aura, and Abraxas were put there (since essentially everyone learns Nosferatu I thought it would be weird to classify it as Light for the sake of this project, but in any other situation I would consider it to be Light magic as well). All Dark Magic I just blanket-labeled as "Dark" since so few people have it, and there aren't really distinct elements within Dark Magic. I classified Sagittae as "nonelemental", as I have no reason to designate it as Light or Wind or anything else based on SoV or 3H.

    Any unit with at least two spells of a particular element is considered to have that element be (one of) their primary element(s). Therefore, some characters do have two primary elements (indicated by an asterisk), but none have three since one would need to be Light, and it ends up that no one has two Reason primary elements in addition to Light. Note, however, that I put Petra under being a primary Wind element even though she ends up being the only unit I analyzed without at least 2 spells of the same element, and she only happens to learn a meager 2 Reason spells at all. Anyways, for all other cases if a unit has one spell of a particular element (save "nonelemental"), I consider that to be a secondary element. I gave Light a unique category for individuals with a single non-nosferatu offensive spell (indicated by a dagger) since it's pretty hard to have 2 unique offensive Light spells given there's only 3 slots at most that they could take up, but I thought it would be unfair to classify everyone with even one such spell in addition to Nosferatu as a Light primary element.

    Observations: (there will be spoilers in here)

    So, the first thing you might realize is that the number of characters with Fire as a "primary element" is more than double the next highest, Thunder and Wind. This is somewhat understandable since I have designated 5 spells as "Fire", and only 3 spells each as "Thunder" and "Wind", but it's still worth noting the favoritism towards Fire (for example, why isn't there a "Tornado" or "Arcthunder" or whatever?). Ice understandably has only two spells, since it has never been considered a unique element before.

    As most of us probably know, very few playable characters can learn Dark Magic, and all of them that we know anything about have some connection to TWSITD, what. a. coincidence. Anyways, of the 3 characters in the original version that have access to Dark Magic, all have at least 2 Dark spells, with Hubert and Lysithea having a whopping 5 each. Jeritza, the fourth, is the only one with a single Dark spell, but he only has a mere 3 Reason spells altogether. The dlc character that may be Hapi also has a straight flush of Dark spells, which additionally suggests a connection between her (?) and TWSITD. Furthermore, in the original version, all five units knowing Ice spells happen to know both (Blizzard and Fimbulvetr), which can't be a coincidence considering there's only two of them. Only perhaps-Constance, another dlc character, breaks this mold, learning Fimbulvetr but not Blizzard. Now, this is much more likely to be coincidence, but Ignatz seems to be the only male who learns Ice spells...

    While it isn't exactly a rule, many characters do seem to fit their primary "elements", such as Ashe (an archer) being Wind and Shamir (a generally cold and dispassionate individual) being Ice, and even such as Edelgard being Fire and Dark (strong convictions with a "dark" secret/past). A few characters, however, seem to have blatantly contrasting personalities to their element(s). For example, Linhardt would appear, at face value, much too lazy and laid back to be a Fire element, and one might think that his Wind element is much more fitting. Yet, seeing as the fervent Crest-Scholar Hanneman is a Fire element, Linhardt's somewhat surprisingly strong interest in books and Crests makes his duality of Fire and Wind less jarring. Similarly, while Hilda may try to appear as a weak damsel, she hides the intensity of Thunder in both physical prowess and her actual spell list (she's one of the only playable units who learn siege magic at that).

    Now, regarding actual spells alone (which can't really be seen the way I've formatted my data, so just trust me on this, or check yourself), several characters have the exact same Reason spell list, these being primarily "pure element" lists. For example, Dimitri, Felix, and Gilbert all only learn Thunder and Thoron, the two "basic" Thunder spells. Is it a coincidence they are all from Farghus? Maybe. Hilda has all the Thunder spells, so those two plus Bolting, but no other ones. Caspar, Raphael, and Alois all have just Fire and Bolganone; Dedue, Leonie, Catherine, and "Balthus" each have those two plus Ragnarok; Rhea has all four standard Fire spells (Fire, Bolganone, Ragnarok, and Agnea's Arrow). Ashe and Cyril both learn just Wind and Cutting Gale. Annette, Claude, and possibly-Yuri learn Wind, Cutting Gale, Sagittae, and Excalibur, although Claude learns Sagittae before Cutting Gale, unlike the other two which learn them in the order I listed them in. Maybe "Yuri" will be somewhat similar to Annette or at least have a support with her (really just my own personal wish since Annette is both your girl and best girl imo)?

    In terms of familial relations, Flayn and Seteth have the same 3 Wind spells and one Fire spell. On the other hand, Annette and Gilbert don't even learn a single common spell, while Jeritza and Mercedes both learn Thunder, but that's where the similarities end. Rhea learns only Fire spells, so she shares one common spell with each her brother and her niece, but more notably both her and Byleth are Fire elements, learning more than 3 Fire spells each.

    Miscellaneous: The "Ashen Demon" is a Fire element. The Light Dragon doesn't learn a single Light offensive spell. Apparently, although Jeralt has a (albeit very basic) Faith spell list, he lacks a Reason spell list altogether, unlike Rhea.

    Spell lists were obtained from Serenes Forest, and the predicted identities of the wave 4 dlc characters were taken from an article there

    submitted by /u/Naxis25
    [link] [comments]

    No comments:

    Post a Comment