Fire Emblem I’d still like to know who thought this skill was a great idea… |
- I’d still like to know who thought this skill was a great idea…
- Natasha on mountain steps (Cherry_c)
- It's weird how easely TWSITD are taken out
- My timeskip Dorothea sketch
- Xander's Character and How Treehouse and Fandom Did Him Dirty
- Florina meeting Ilyana, with predictable results (commission by ShovelKun on SketchMob)
- I was commissioned by Caspar's VA Ben Diskin to draw Caspar!
- A cool tidbit about Edelgard's design
- The Fainting of Byleth
- Winter kiss (OC)
- Helda!!
- Selkie! @Izuri_03 on Twitter (Fates)
- I draw it!
- Which permanently playable character would have made a good villain in an altered story?
- So what did the Agarthans EVEN DO for Nemesis? (3H Spoilers)
- Fire Emblem: Binding Blade Hard Mode ETC Challenge Chapter 4
- Conquest Charity Stream for No Kid Hungry! (Donate to change units classes)
- Do you prefer Eirika or Micaiah?
- Journey's End
- What were your favorite “unconventional” class assignments for Three Houses units?
- What are your fondest moments or memories of Fire Emblem: Sacred Stones?
I’d still like to know who thought this skill was a great idea… Posted: 29 Aug 2021 04:14 PM PDT
| ||
Natasha on mountain steps (Cherry_c) Posted: 29 Aug 2021 10:45 AM PDT
| ||
It's weird how easely TWSITD are taken out Posted: 29 Aug 2021 05:32 AM PDT The one aspect of 3H that I think everyone will agree is a weak point of the writting is the whole TWSITD aspect. While they do have a suprisingly detailed backstory they just aren't interestingly written or developed in any way. They're essentially there to be the one dimensional bad guys in a game where most factions are fairly grey. However, the one aspect I want to focus on here is how easely they're taken out on every route. For perspective, TWSITD have access to teleportation magic, can disguise themselves to take the appearance of anyone, have daggers that can pierce through armor easely and instantly kill you, advanced thechnological golems and tracking missles. They're far more technologicaly advanced than any other nation in 3H and they've managed to effectively infilitrate the biggest and most powerful nation on the entire continent. Even when accounting for their low numbers they should still be nearely unstoppable. However, they aren't, in fact they're pretty easely taken out. In Jeritza's S support, he and Byleth defeat TWSITD by themselves. Yep, the entirety of TWSITD apparentlly fell to two strong losers with swords. In Claude's ending with Byleth it's said that leftover imperial forces joined up with TWSITD before being promptly defeated by Claude. And finally in Hapi's solo ending it's mentioned how she managed to defeat them by herself. Heck, in SS and VW their main base of operations is uncovered by Hubert. How? IDK, it just is. And they just lose straightup, despite the fact that it has been established that they have spies at Garreg Mach. How did they not see this coming? And I know teleportation is a beaten horse by this trope, but why don't TWSITD just kill a whole bunch of people in their sleep with their magic daggers? Like, I understand that the missles can't target Garreg Mach, but it's been shown they can teleport in and out of Garreg Mach at will. It just feels weird how this incredebly powerful organisation which essentially controls Foldland from the shadows somehow gets defeated so anticlimacticaly. It would be like if FE6 ended after you defeat Zephiel and then Roy's ending card said: "Oh yeah and Roy just dealt with Idunn pretty easely". It just makes me question why they're built up so much if they're gonna be offed like a bunch of jobbers. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 29 Aug 2021 05:49 PM PDT
| ||
Xander's Character and How Treehouse and Fandom Did Him Dirty Posted: 29 Aug 2021 02:10 PM PDT Xander as a character is a controversial subject in the community, mostly because there seems to be a huge discrepancy between how he acts in the story and how he acts in supports. Most people have latched on to this "There are two Xanders in Fates" belief (in no small part thanks to a very dedicated FE-tuber), but not only do I disagree with the assessment as a whole, but I think the writers got criticized for something that is not their fault. The main crux of the argument is that "Xander supposedly argues with/wants to go against Garon, but the story makes him a loyal lapdog". But Xander... was never written like that. He was never supposed to be a character who would argue with Garon, talk badly about him or directly go against him. To start, the thing that serves as the foundation for the argument: Xander and Corrin's supports. In B support#B_Support), Corrin says this line: "You're swinging your sword so fiercely today, with a wild look in your eyes. It's the same look you always had on nights when you and Father would argue." However, in the JP version of the support, she says this: "The nights when they said father was in a bad mood, you put yourself through some rigorous, violent training. The way you're training right now too, you seem restless. That's the impression I get." Xander never argued against Garon in the past. He vented frustration through training when Garon was being a dick. In A support#A_Support) (the one that really matters), Xander says this: "Sometimes being crown prince means following the king's orders no matter what. But there were times when I felt his commands crossed a line. Sometimes it didn't feel like he was trying to benefit the kingdom at all, just himself. Having to do things I didn't believe in weighed heavily on my heart. Now I'm wise enough and brave enough to stand up to Father. But back then... Those were the nights you spoke of, when I swung my blade like a wild beast." But in the JP version of the same support, he says this: "I'm always thinking about putting the country first before everything else, but I also consider Father's orders as absolute. But, that father, when he gives orders that don't take into account the country's best interests... And when I just can't, for the life of me, agree with these orders... In these moments, indeed, my sword may be rather violent." The line where he said "Now I'm wise enough and brave enough to stand up to Father" does not exist in the original script. And why would it? It goes completely against everything that's established about Xander in the story. In chapter 2, before you can even view supports, he is ordered to fight against Corrin when she disobeys Garon's orders. And Xander complies. This is because Xander is scared of Garon. In the Boo Camp dlc, he says: "What I always feared, more than any apparition or specter... It was the time I ran across my father in the halls at night. If I hadn't been out of bed for honest reasons, things might have been bad." (This translation by Treehouse is pretty accurate, actually. They aren't that bad at localization, after all. It just the issues that do come up in their work are often very bad) The Nohrian siblings in general are scared of Garon. Camilla says in CQ chapter 13 that she doesn't disobey orders, because she knows she would be killed. Leo says the same in chapter 14, plus he says Xander and Elise would tell you the same thing. Camilla in Revelation also knows that failing her mission would mean death, so she says she'd prefer to die by Corrin's hands instead when she gets defeated. And when you fear something, especially a family member, fighting back isn't everyone's first instinct. You may think the Nohrian siblings are cowards for that, but that's how they're written. They're written to be scared, to be in denial of their father being a monster, to grin and bear it through all the things they're forced to do just to survive, in hopes that tomorrow will be better somehow. Hell, more than once, I believe it's said that they "hope Father will get better after all this is over." And this brings me to my next point: Some of Xander's lines in the story were also changed. Chapter 7 Conquest: In localization, when ordered to kill Corrin upon her return to Nohr, Xander says "I won't do it! I'm sorry, father." In the JP version, he doesn't say anything, he only expresses a non-verbal hesitation. Because Xander was never written to directly defy orders like that. Same chapter: In localization, when overhearing Garon's ramblings, Xander says "...So it is true. I should have known. Father only wishes to make Corrin suffer... in that case, I know what I must do." In the JP version he says, "…… Father… No way, was that decree just now all for the sake of tormenting Corrin? If that's the case… I too have a plan." Instead of already being aware of his Father being evil at this point, he expresses denial. Because he was always meant to be in denial. Chapter 9 Conquest: As Garon is contemplating if he should punish Corrin for disobeying his orders regarding the Ice Tribe, localization Xander eventually says "Father, kill me or kill no one. That is all there is to it." In the JP version,this line doesn't exist, Xander just remains silent instead. Because Xander was never written to argue against his father like that. Chapter 16 Conquest: While recounting his memories of Azura, localization Xander eventually says "Those who loved Queen Katerina were not happy about Queen Arete or her daughter. Camilla and I...and later Leo...were told not to associate with Azura because of this. I suppose Father wanted to protect the strength of his legacy or some nonsense." That last line, "I suppose Father wanted to protect the strength of his legacy or some nonsense" is not in the JP version at all. Because Xander was never written to bad mouth his father like that. (And also it makes no sense because Garon was never the one who mistreated Arete and Azura, it was the other concubines and aristocrats) Chapter 24 Conquest: Xander's infamous Justice Speech goes like this:/Script) "Little princess... The sad truth is that justice is an illusion. A child's fairy tale. There is no light path that always leads to good, nor dark path that leads to evil. To believe that—to see the world in black and white—is missing half the picture. All that matters are the choices we make—especially the hard ones. […] Letting innocents die is a tragedy, but so is letting the chance for peace slip away. This is war. There is no such thing as a clean win when lives are on the line. Instead of clinging to a false sense of justice, hold strong to something true... The desire to do what you know is right and to protect the ones you love... And the ambition to see your vision of a peaceful future through to the end. If we allow evil men to let their vision take precedence over our own, we all lose. Remember that, and find solace in it." But in the JP version, it goes like this: "…Things like justice do not exist. This is war. In this world, there is no right or wrong way of being. There is only… ambition and desire. Moreover, it is what is expected. You would do well to remember that." (Yes, it is that short) Chapter 27 Conquest: Here's what localization Xander says before entering the throne room: "Hmm... So be it, Corrin. You have led us this far. The least we can do is follow you just a little farther. I am choosing to trust you, Sister. However, you know what will happen if this all turns out to be an elaborate ruse. If you mean to trap us, your siblings who have loved you all these years... You will be punished, just like any other traitor. I will not allow anyone, even you, to bring harm to my family or the kingdom of Nohr. If you can accept those terms, as I trust you will, let us proceed." In the JP version, he says this: "…I understand. This whole time, you have led us in this war. So…I believe you. In your words. But, if what you say turns out to be a lie… It will be concluded that you betrayed us, and the entire army will turn against you, as an enemy. I just want you to be prepared." Much less cold to his sister, huh? Same chapter: Localization Xander says this to Monster Garon: "It is you who knows nothing! Of my father, of me, or of my brother/sister here. All this time, I have strived to be a good son and a worthy heir. I have faithfully followed your orders, even when doing so tortured my soul. I brushed aside my early memories of Father and accepted you as our king. I fought in your name, hoping one day you would reawaken as the man you once were. But that man is dead and has been for a long time now..." JP version has him say this: "You bastard, what do you understand of Father…! …All this time, I had to pretend not to see. I never disobeyed any order. Someday, everything would go back to the way it used to be… I fought believing that. But, the father of those days is already…" Xander revealing he had to pretend not to see-i.e. being in denial-was removed in localization. Conquest's final cinematic (yes, even this): Localization Xander says this: "You're just in time. You've always had a gift for that. No doubt you always will. There was no sense in this war, only madness and greed. War is monstrous. We are told to make war to support our country. But…it's a lie. Told by those who profit from bloodshed. In my reign as Nohr's new king, I vow to seek peace and understanding. With you to guide my hand." In the JP version he says this: "You're all just as boisterous as usual. Just like back then… It's certainly the same now. There was no justice in the previous battles. No, whether or not there was justice is not for me to say. Justice… is a fragile thing, that changes depending on how you look at it. But, at the very least… As king I will maintain the justice I believe in. The one who taught me the importance of that, was you." Xander developing his own sense of justice was cut out of localization, despite 'Where Justice Lies' being a central theme of the route. Xander's "inconsistencies" are a result of Treehouse removing key lines, adding lines that never existed in the original script, and rewriting him to make him seem more harsh and blind to evil. "But what about in Chapter 18 where he does the honorable thing despite not believing in justice?" Not only are honor and justice not really the same thing, the Nohrian siblings constantly go behind their father's back to do things their way. They're afraid to openly defy him, but that doesn't mean they're completely helpless. "But what about in Birthright where he's a dick to Corrin despite their relationship? His keen observational skills should have let him see that she's doing good things, he should've understood where she was coming from!" What's there to understand? She's choosing to stand against the Kingdom he loves, and declares his father-someone he knows much better than she does-is evil and must be killed. You're expecting him to defer to character traits that only show themselves when he's on your side. Context matters. "But what about when he disrespects Elise's final wish, and chooses to die like a coward instead of doing what's best for his kingdom?" He just accidentally killed his little sister, when he was already depressed and suicidal. He even spoke to Laslow and Peri beforehand as if he was expecting to die. He's not in a rational state of mind, he's sad, frustrated and broken. Why is crystal clear logic from Xander expected at that point, when that is in no way reasonable? Again, context matters. "Does all of this really matter in the end, though?" Yeah, it does. You can still not like Fates' story and you can still not like Xander. But this belief that it was the writers' fault for "ruining their best character" is based on exaggeration, misunderstanding context and lack of research in regards to the original script. The basis is wrong, and it needs to end. Fates never ruined its best character. Treehouse ruined Fates' best character. [link] [comments] | ||
Florina meeting Ilyana, with predictable results (commission by ShovelKun on SketchMob) Posted: 29 Aug 2021 02:13 PM PDT
| ||
I was commissioned by Caspar's VA Ben Diskin to draw Caspar! Posted: 29 Aug 2021 07:11 PM PDT
| ||
A cool tidbit about Edelgard's design Posted: 29 Aug 2021 07:26 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 28 Aug 2021 09:50 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 29 Aug 2021 05:58 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 29 Aug 2021 07:50 AM PDT
| ||
Selkie! @Izuri_03 on Twitter (Fates) Posted: 29 Aug 2021 01:35 PM PDT | ||
Posted: 29 Aug 2021 07:46 AM PDT
| ||
Which permanently playable character would have made a good villain in an altered story? Posted: 28 Aug 2021 11:53 PM PDT For example, Tharja - her obsession with Robin and fondness for dark magic could have played out differently. [link] [comments] | ||
So what did the Agarthans EVEN DO for Nemesis? (3H Spoilers) Posted: 29 Aug 2021 01:43 PM PDT Spoilers, kinda, since most of what happens is in the opening cutscene, but I'll flair it just in case. Before I start, I'll try to do a quick little plot summary of Nemesis' story pre-game
So like, he kills Sothis without the help of the Agarthans. And he dies by the hand of a lesser god while using the tools he was given by the Agarthans. But, like, he kiled Sothis without any help, so why did he need any more power? If he was able to kill her, then he should have been able to kill the lesser Nabateans in the pantheon without the Agarthan's help. How did Seiros - a lesser god - kill him (single-handedly, I might add) when he was empowered by both Agarthan tech and the blood, bones, and bile of the goddess? If he was already strong enough to kill Sothis by himself, why did he need the help of the Agarthans to take out her children? AND WHY DID HE LOSE? Did the Agarthan tech make him weaker? If so, then why do the Agarthans try again with Edelgard, if they know it would make her weaker? Why is Nemesis so glossed over in the plot of the narrative, and how did he actually kill Sothis if he was literally just a dude with no deified power? [link] [comments] | ||
Fire Emblem: Binding Blade Hard Mode ETC Challenge Chapter 4 Posted: 29 Aug 2021 12:52 PM PDT
| ||
Conquest Charity Stream for No Kid Hungry! (Donate to change units classes) Posted: 29 Aug 2021 04:37 PM PDT
| ||
Do you prefer Eirika or Micaiah? Posted: 29 Aug 2021 10:09 AM PDT So I ask this cause I am curious which might be more favored as fans of Micaiah has died down over the years and Eirika fans has risen at the same time. The characters both are rather kind and excellent showing of how a character can be both a main and supporting character towards others. [link] [comments] | ||
Posted: 29 Aug 2021 04:09 PM PDT
| ||
What were your favorite “unconventional” class assignments for Three Houses units? Posted: 29 Aug 2021 11:34 AM PDT I'm starting a new run and I'm just doing Hard and have a lot of the pre-work done for basic skills, so I wanted to put some units in some cool non-obvious class choices. It doesn't have to be super weird, just anything beyond their second or third most obvious choice. (Im playing Golden Deer but doing a lot of recruiting, and using a lot of Ashen Wolves too since im finally getting around to the DLC). Thanks in advance! [link] [comments] | ||
What are your fondest moments or memories of Fire Emblem: Sacred Stones? Posted: 29 Aug 2021 07:37 PM PDT I'm gearing up to record the next episode of RPG University, the RPG-focused podcast, focused all on Fire Emblem: Sacred Stones, and would love your favorite moments and memories with the game! Share your memories and talk about the great times you remember, and it could be included in the episode! Credit will be given :D [link] [comments] |
You are subscribed to email updates from Fire Emblem Fans Unite!. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment